Analysis of The Apology by Plato

The self-justification was written by Plato, and relates Socrates denial at his trial on charges of corrupting the youth and impiety. Socrates argues that he is innocent of both charges. His defense is ultimately unsuccessful, and he is convicted and sentenced to death. Socrates concludes the self-justification by arguing that a just man should fox no fear of death.\n[Note that this precedent divide concisely does ii things: it sets up the issue to be discussed, and it briefly presents the position of the Socrates on the master(prenominal) topics (his innocence and his depend of death). Long background histories and so on are non needed in these written document get straight to the point.\nSocrates defends himself against the charges brought against him by his prosecutor Meletus in devil ways. One way consists of a description of Socrates motivation and method, which he hopes will explain to the jury why some people, including his prosecutors, shun him. The second defe nse consists of Socrates responding at a time to the two charges brought against him: corrupting the one-year-old and impiety, or more than specifically, not believing in the gods in whom the city believes (p. 28). Ill holler these two lines of defense in turn. I wrote this second split to clarify the argumentative structure of the paper. I could have withal combined this second paragraph with the first one, but it seemed more natural to separate it in this case.\nWhen I thought more or less Socrates defense, it seemed to me that it had two main part: the part where he explains why he has a horrid reputation, and the part where he responds now to the charges against him. The first paragraphs are ordinarily the hardest ones to write. You have to stop and find near what the main thesis or theses of the paper are, and in any case think about the main argument(s) for them. Fortunately, once youve thought about these things, the rest of the paper usually falls into place . Socrates begins his defense by ...