Gun control Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words - 2

hoagy control - Research makeup ExampleThe proponents of bomber rightfields grapple that the availability of gun in the public spheres allows the flock to protect themselves, and this at last is a solvent to the gun crisis that exist in the affected states. Gun control is indeed non a solution for the violence and killing that argon evident in states such as the States. The Gun culture is an issue that started back in the 1970s when citizens were given the right to possess a gun as a defense weapon. In the famous westward expansion in the history of America, the citizens were allowed to shelter their lives from attackers and wild animals in a period that was characterized with war and rivarly. This implies that the initial motive of providing gun rights was to protect the muckle from criminal acts that were threatening the people. In a period of high crime like the 21stcentury, the purchase of guns has change magnitude as people prep ar to counter these crime rates in the public domain. The supporters of the Gun rights argue that this is the period that people need more personal protection than ever in the history of America (Moorhouse 103-124). Consequently, legalizing the purchase of guns in USA allow for empower the citizens to be more conscious of crime at their homes. Statistics compiled in 1990 establish pointed out to the aggravation of criminal activities in the United States, most of which were perpetrateted by work up proclaimers. Crooker (1) points out that atleast one person dies in America every 18 minutes which amounts to a thoroughgoing of about 30, 000 deathst very year. Of these, less than 50% of people who die are killed while the rest are victims of accidental gun shots and other commit murder using legally owned weapons. The question that emerges from these human body of statistics is whether legal arms or illegal arms result to the increased material body of gun deaths in the united states. From the point of critical eval uator, legal arms as well are dangerous in the public sphere and the question of withdrawing gun rights can be raised at this point. Withdrawing the public right to own a gun would help to reduce the number of accidental deaths as well as the rate of suicide that has threatened the existence of the citizens in America. On this ground, most supporters of gun control go through that both illegal and legal arms should be withdrawn from the public to ensure that the people are safe from sudden deaths. However withdrawing the gun from the public spheres may not be an ultimate solution to the number of gun deaths that are increasing each day as more rifles find their vogue into the public sphere. DeConde (172) presents the pros and cons of denying the public the rights to possess legal firearms which has underpinned the death of more citizens every year. Depossessing the public with the right to own firearms will ensure that the rates of suicide would decrease considerably and the conse quent drop in the number of people who die from stray bullets. However, the impact that this would have is that illegal arm owners, who are mostly criminals ,would have an advantage over the public, which is likely to trigger higher crime rates in the American society.In essence, this will be leaving the public more vulnerable to criminals which will lead to the death of loyal people and the thrive of criminals. Otherwise, the government would be forced to be more responsible of the security which is practically unrealistic given the high population